<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>

<channel>
	<title>English Coast Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.english-coast.net/blog/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.english-coast.net/blog</link>
	<description>English coastal photography</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2008 08:56:11 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>The Martello Towers of the Kent and Sussex Coast</title>
		<link>http://www.english-coast.net/blog/2008/07/martello-towers-kent-sussex/</link>
		<comments>http://www.english-coast.net/blog/2008/07/martello-towers-kent-sussex/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 20:39:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[East Sussex]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[History]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Kent]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Martello Towers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.english-coast.net/blog/?p=11</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[74 Martello Towers were built along the coast of Kent and East Sussex, between 1805 and 1808 to guard against invasion by Napoleon along with other defensive measures such as Forts, Redoubts and the Royal Military Canal (which runs through Hythe).

The inspiration for the south coast implementation of these distinctive round towers came from a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>74 Martello Towers were built along the coast of <a title="Kent" href="http://www.english-coast.net/kent/">Kent</a> and <a title="East Sussex" href="http://www.english-coast.net/east-sussex/">East Sussex</a>, between 1805 and 1808 to guard against invasion by Napoleon along with other defensive measures such as Forts, Redoubts and the Royal Military Canal (which runs through <a title="Hythe" href="http://www.english-coast.net/kent/hythe/">Hythe</a>).<br />
<iframe src="http://www.english-coast.net/martello.htm" width="470" height="350" frameborder="0"></iframe><br />
<a href="http://www.english-coast.net/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/tower-25-dymchurch.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-16" title="Martello Tower 25" src="http://www.english-coast.net/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/tower-25-dymchurch-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a>The inspiration for the south coast implementation of these distinctive round towers came from a British attack in 1794 on Mortella Point in Corsica. The Mortella Point tower resisted attack from the Royal Navy ships HMS Fortitude and HMS Juno, resulting in 60 casualties on the British ships and the ships had to abandon the attack. It was left to the army to eventually take the tower after 2 days of heavy fighting. The tower had achieved this long resistance with only 38 men, one 6-pounder gun and two 18-pounder guns.</p>
<p>The name Martello Tower took a while to settle on by the English military planners, probably originating from &#8216;Torri de Martello&#8217;, the name given to watchtowers in parts of Western Italy, but also perhaps from one Naval officer who described Mortella Point as &#8216;Myrtello Point&#8217; as the headland that the tower stood on was covered with wild myrtle. Other descriptions used were &#8217;sea-towers&#8217;, &#8216;bomb-proof towers&#8217;, or &#8216;Corsican towers&#8217; and in 1803 finally as &#8216;Martello towers&#8217;.</p>
<p>The towers never actually saw active service of course, Napoleon&#8217;s planned invasion came to nothing particularly after the Battle of Trafalgar defeat for the French Fleet which forced Napoleon to look elsewhere for conquest.</p>
<p>Today only around 26 of the original towers are still standing, many were built upon shingle beaches and the sea has inevitably claimed them, others were demolished to make way for modern developments, for example the Promenade at Hythe/Sandgate. Several have been restored and converted into residences, tower 24 at <a title="Dymchurch, Kent" href="http://www.english-coast.net/kent/dymchurch/">Dymchurch</a> is now a museum, and the Wish Tower (Number 73) at <a title="Eastbourne" href="http://www.english-coast.net/east-sussex/eastbourne/">Eastbourne</a> is also open to the public.</p>
<table border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>1*</td>
<td>Folkestone</td>
<td><a href="http://www.english-coast.net/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/martello-tower1.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-18" title="Martello Tower 1, Folkestone" src="http://www.english-coast.net/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/martello-tower1-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a>On the 200ft cliff above East Wear Bay. Reported as having defective brickwork as far back as 1873. Recently undergoing restoration.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2*</td>
<td>Folkestone</td>
<td><a href="http://www.english-coast.net/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/martello-tower2.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-19" title="Martello Tower 2" src="http://www.english-coast.net/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/martello-tower2-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a>Converted into dwelling in 1964. On a knoll slightly inland, 50ft below the first tower.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>3*</td>
<td>Folkestone</td>
<td><a href="http://www.english-coast.net/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/martello-tower3.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-20" title="Martello Tower 3" src="http://www.english-coast.net/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/martello-tower3-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a>On the cliff edge above Copt Point, with a good view of Folkestone harbour. Features in a painting of Folkestone by Turner in 1830.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>4*</td>
<td>Folkestone</td>
<td><a href="http://www.english-coast.net/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/martello-tower4.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-21" title="Martello Tower 4" src="http://www.english-coast.net/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/martello-tower4-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a>Stands in the garden of a private house at the Western end of the Leas. Was fitted with a semaphore machine in 1820, as were three others (towers 27, 31, and 55). Was used during World War II by the Observer Corps.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>5*</td>
<td>Folkestone</td>
<td>In the grounds of the Girl&#8217;s Technical School behind Sandgate High Street, off Coolinge Lane. In good condition, the door of one of the two magazine compartments is still covered with copper with details of the contents painted. It is almost directly in line with Sandgate Castle on the shore below.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>6*</td>
<td>Shorncliffe Camp</td>
<td>Overgrown with trees growing in the moat/ditch, and the roof covered soil and vegetation.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>7*</td>
<td>Shorncliffe Camp</td>
<td>Sealed to prevent vandalism, a wooden floor is laid inside but this may not be the original floor.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>8*</td>
<td>Shorncliffe Camp</td>
<td>Converted into a dwelling, just outside of the Shorncliffe Camp area.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>9*</td>
<td>Shorncliffe Camp</td>
<td>In a fair state of preservation, with most of the stucco in place, and the ditch brickwork in good order.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>10</td>
<td>Hythe Promenade</td>
<td>Was sited near near where the Imperial Hotel now stands.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>11</td>
<td>Hythe Promenade</td>
<td>Was sited near Saltwood Gardens.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>12</td>
<td>Hythe Promenade</td>
<td>Was sited at the south end of Stade Street.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>13*</td>
<td>Hythe</td>
<td>On West parade, sold by the War Depatment in 1907, and converted into a dwelling in 1928 by A.J.Glock who named it Place Forte. It was requisitioned as an obsevation post during World War II. The designer of the Dungeness Lighthouse, Ronald Ward owned it from 1960 and completely converted it. It is now simply named as the Martello Tower.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>14*</td>
<td>Hythe, Firing ranges</td>
<td>Located in the Hythe army firing ranges. The letter &#8216;A&#8217; was painted on the side of the tower, signifying the range that the tower is located within.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>15*</td>
<td>Hythe, Firing ranges</td>
<td>Located in the Hythe army firing ranges. The letter &#8216;D&#8217; was painted on the side of the tower, signifying the range that the tower is located within.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>16</td>
<td>Hythe, Firing ranges</td>
<td>Some ruins visible, but destroyed before the Second World War.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>17</td>
<td>Hythe, Firing ranges</td>
<td>Some ruins visible, but destroyed before the Second World War.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>18</td>
<td>Hythe, Firing ranges</td>
<td>Some ruins visible, but destroyed before the Second World War.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>19*</td>
<td>Hythe, Firing ranges</td>
<td><a href="http://www.english-coast.net/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/martello-tower19.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-22" title="Martello Tower 19" src="http://www.english-coast.net/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/martello-tower19-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a>Located in the Hythe army firing ranges. The letter &#8216;N&#8217; was painted on the side of the tower, signifying the range that the tower is located within. Now largely ruined.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>20</td>
<td></td>
<td>Disappeared early in the 20th Century.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>21</td>
<td></td>
<td>Disappeared early in the 20th Century.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>22</td>
<td>Dymchurch</td>
<td>Built to protect the Willop Sluice in Hythe Road along with No.23, but destroyed in 1956 for road improvements.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>23*</td>
<td>Dymchurch</td>
<td>Built to protect the Willop Sluice in Hythe Road, paired with No.22 but No.22 was destroyed to make way for road widening. This tower has been restored and is used as a residence.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>24*</td>
<td>Dymchurch</td>
<td>Built to guard the Marshland Sluice, this tower has been fully restored and is open to the public.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>25*</td>
<td>Dymchurch</td>
<td>Twinned with Tower 24 to guard the Marshland Sluice, the outside has been restored. It is now located within a public car park.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>26</td>
<td>St.Mary&#8217;s Church</td>
<td>Guarded the Globsden Gut sluice gates opposite St.Mary&#8217;s Church, but was demolished in 1871.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>27</td>
<td>St.Mary&#8217;s Church</td>
<td>Guarded the Globsden Gut sluice gates with Tower 26. Was a semaphore station. Demolished in 1841. Last of the Kent towers.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>28*</td>
<td>Rye Harbour</td>
<td>The first Sussex tower and still standing on the river Rother in Rye Harbour. Named Enchantress Tower.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>29</td>
<td>Rye Harbour</td>
<td>Abandoned early on, stood near the harbour mouth.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>30*</td>
<td>Rye</td>
<td>Two miles inland, but built to protect the sluices of the Royal Military Canal, and the rivers Brede and Tillingham. Moated tower, part of the drawbridge fixture remains. Two sash windows were added as it was used as a residence at one point.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>31</td>
<td>Pett Level</td>
<td>Was situated at Dog&#8217;s Hill, built directly onto the shingle beach and thus subject to erosion and swept away.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>32</td>
<td>Pett Level</td>
<td>Built directly onto the shingle beach and thus subject to erosion and swept away.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>33</td>
<td>Pett Level</td>
<td>Built directly onto the shingle beach and thus subject to erosion and swept away.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>34</td>
<td>Pett Level</td>
<td>Built directly onto the shingle beach and thus subject to erosion and swept away.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>35</td>
<td>Pett Level</td>
<td>Blown up by the Royal Engineers in 1872.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>36</td>
<td>Pett Level</td>
<td>Built directly onto the shingle beach and thus subject to erosion and swept away.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>37</td>
<td>Pett Level</td>
<td>Blown up by the Royal Engineers in 1864.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>38</td>
<td>Pett Level</td>
<td>Blown up by the Royal Engineers in 1872. Situated at Cliff End near Hastings.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>39</td>
<td>St. Leonards</td>
<td>Low level tower, located near to West Marina. Partially collapsed in 1876, and the remains blown up by the Royal Engineers.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>40</td>
<td>St. Leonards</td>
<td>Low level tower, demolished in the 1870&#8217;s.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>41</td>
<td>Bulverhythe</td>
<td>Low level tower built at The Salts, Bulverhythe. Had suffered sea erosion by 1842 and while arrangements were being made to sell the materials upon demolition, was destroyed by a gale and swept into the sea.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>42</td>
<td>Bulverhythe</td>
<td>Low level tower built at The Salts, Bulverhythe. Demolished in 1840 and the materials sold. Some of the stone was later used in building a Chancel to St.Mark&#8217;s Church in Cooden.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>43</td>
<td>Bulverhythe Bay</td>
<td>Bulverhythe Cliff, on the cliff top overlooking Bulverhythe Bay. Collapsed into the sea by the 20th Century.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>44</td>
<td>Bulverhythe Bay</td>
<td>Gally Hill,  on the cliff top overlooking Bulverhythe Bay. Collapsed into the sea by the 20th Century.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>45</td>
<td>Sackville Hotel</td>
<td>Destroyed by 1839. Possibly the first tower depicted in drawing by Turner for his work &#8216;Liber Studiorum&#8217; in 1817.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>46</td>
<td>Colonade</td>
<td>Demolished in 1870. Traces found in 1910 when the Colonade was built.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>47</td>
<td>Polegrove</td>
<td>Not known when this tower disappeared, presumably late 19th Century.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>48</td>
<td>Pages Avenue</td>
<td>Built to the south of Pages Avenue, demolished in 1858.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>49</td>
<td>Veness Gap</td>
<td>Disappeared presumably late 19th Century.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>50</td>
<td>Cooden Beach Hotel</td>
<td>Destroyed in 1860 as a test target for a demonstration event to show the superiority of the Royal Artillery&#8217;s new muzzle-loading guns over the old breach-loading guns.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>51</td>
<td>Cooden</td>
<td>On the beach and washed away by the 20th Century</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>52</td>
<td>Cooden</td>
<td>On the beach and washed away by the 20th Century</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>53</td>
<td>Cooden</td>
<td>On the beach and washed away by the 20th Century</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>54</td>
<td>Cooden</td>
<td>On the beach and washed away by the 20th Century</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>55*</td>
<td>Norman&#8217;s Bay</td>
<td>Close to the sea but still standing. Was one of the four semaphore towers.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>56</td>
<td>Pevensey</td>
<td>Destroyed by sea erosion</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>57</td>
<td>Pevensey</td>
<td>Destroyed by sea erosion</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>58</td>
<td>Pevensey</td>
<td>Destroyed by sea erosion</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>59</td>
<td>Pevensey</td>
<td>Demolished in 1903</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>60*</td>
<td>Pevensey Bay</td>
<td>Stands in Pevensey Bay village close to the shore. In fair condition.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>61*</td>
<td>Martello Estate</td>
<td>Stands in the Martello Estate</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>62*</td>
<td></td>
<td>Used as a residence</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>63</td>
<td></td>
<td>Destroyed by the Germans during World War II.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>64*</td>
<td></td>
<td>Near to the sea, but still standing.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>65</td>
<td></td>
<td>In ruins by the start of the Second World War..</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>66*</td>
<td>Langney Point</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>67</td>
<td></td>
<td>Low level tower</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>68</td>
<td>St.Anthony&#8217;s Hill</td>
<td>Used as a target for the new rifled Armstrong guns in 1860. Housing estate later built on the site, the circular moat is still reflected in the road called the Circus.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>69</td>
<td></td>
<td>Low level tower</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>70</td>
<td></td>
<td>Low level tower</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>71</td>
<td></td>
<td>Used as a target for the new rifled Armstrong guns in 1860.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>72</td>
<td>Eastbourne</td>
<td>Low level tower</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>73*</td>
<td>Eastbourne</td>
<td>The Wish Tower, got it&#8217;s name from the nearby marshland known as the&#8217;Wash&#8217; or &#8216;Wish&#8217;. Used by the coastguards after the Napoleonic threat receded and then abandoned. Saved from the threat of demolition, and became a museum. In 1959 it was declared an ancient monument, and completely restored. Now open to the public.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>74*</td>
<td>Seaford</td>
<td>Built in 1810 and still standing, although it seashore position makes it vulnerable to future erosion. Sold by the War Office in 1880, it was a museum until 1911, and then converted into a cafe/amusement arcade. Many alterations were made which make this tower difficult to recognise in it&#8217;s current form.</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><em>Notes about this list: The main reference source was published in 1972, over the coming months we will be further researching to ensure an accurate 2008 status for each tower. If you have further or more up-to-date information about any of the towers please post a comment and we will update.</em></p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">References</span><br />
Martello Towers, Sheila Sutcliffe (David &amp; Charles 1972)<br />
The Cinque Ports and Romney Marsh, Margaret Brentnall (John Gifford, 1972)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.english-coast.net/blog/2008/07/martello-towers-kent-sussex/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>History of the Goodwin Sands</title>
		<link>http://www.english-coast.net/blog/2008/05/goodwin-sands-history/</link>
		<comments>http://www.english-coast.net/blog/2008/05/goodwin-sands-history/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 20:53:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[History]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Kent]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Shipwrecks]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Goodwin Sands]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Stirling Castle]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.english-coast.net/blog/?p=9</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Description of Goodwin Sands
The Goodwin Sands are a notorious stretch of sands just off the coast of Kent in the English Channel. Submerged at high tides, with areas being exposed and drying sufficiently for a man to walk on at low tides, they present a particular challenge to shipping especially given their unfortunate location… at [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h3>Description of Goodwin Sands</h3>
<p>The Goodwin Sands are a notorious stretch of sands just off the <a title="Kent coast" href="http://www.english-coast.net/kent/">coast of Kent</a> in the English Channel. Submerged at high tides, with areas being exposed and drying sufficiently for a man to walk on at low tides, they present a particular challenge to shipping especially given their unfortunate location<em>… at the narrowest part of the busiest shipping channel in the world.</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.english-coast.net/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/goodwin-sands.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-12" title="Goodwin Sands" src="http://www.english-coast.net/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/goodwin-sands.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="352" /></a></p>
<p><span style="color: #c0c0c0;"><em>Image: The Goodwin Sands, reproduced under Project Gutenberg License</em></span></p>
<p>The Goodwin Sands are around four miles offshore, beginning near Kingsdown, Kent and ending around Pegwell Bay, just south of <a title="Ramsgate coast" href="http://www.english-coast.net/kent/ramsgate/">Ramsgate</a>, a total length of around nine miles. The channel between the coast and the sands is known as the Downs, and although the sands present a grave danger to shipping, their position has also provided protection and thus the Downs and Goodwin Sands, and the protective Harbour at Ramsgate made this area historically important. In fact it may be true to say that over the past 1000 years, this stretch of the English Channel can be considered historically the most important stretch of water in the world.</p>
<h3>History</h3>
<p>The geological history of the Goodwin Sands is disputed; some believing it was previously an island which became swamped by sediment and rising sea levels, others that is simply an accumulation of sediment swept into place by the English Channel funnelling back and forth through the narrow straits of <a title="Dover" href="http://www.english-coast.net/kent/dover/">Dover</a>. It is true that the nearby Thanet area was in fact an island back in Roman times (hence the full title; Isle of Thanet) and this may lead people to believe the Goodwin Sands are of a similar nature. However the few attempts at surveying the Sands by drilling have not shown any evidence of soil or organic matter which would suggest an island existed. It is more likely that the Sands are simply an accumulation of sediment on a predominantly solid chalk base.</p>
<p>Since the first recorded shipwreck in the Goodwin Sands area dating back to 1298, the maritime history is one of enormous loss of life and shipping. Ships, the crew and passengers that become stranded on the sands were often facing a terrible fate. Typically a ship would break its back as the tide changed, survivors may have been able to clamber onto the sands as the tide receded, and light fires and attempt to attract the attention of the Boatsmen of <a title="Deal coast" href="http://www.english-coast.net/kent/deal/">Deal</a> and Kingsdown, or the lifeboats in later eras. If no help was forthcoming then within hours the tide would return, the sands would turn into lethal quicksand, and ships and survivors would be engulfed. Many ships were simply swallowed whole within a few days.</p>
<p>There are over 1000 recorded shipwrecks, and it is likely that the true toll may be more like 2000-3000 ships lost.</p>
<h3>Notable Wrecks</h3>
<p>The first documented wreck in the Goodwin Sands was in 1298, when a ship (name not known) returning from Flanders was lost “near <a title="Sandwich Kent" href="http://www.english-coast.net/kent/sandwich/">Sandwich</a>”.</p>
<p>Many more were to follow, one wreck of note was the HM Frigate Sedgmore, a 50 gun ship which was stranded near South Foreland in 1689. It was reportedly carrying over £200,000 in bullion, a vast sum in those times. No bullion was actually found or recovered, but it would be true to say that there will be many other ships carrying precious cargo which are still waiting discovery in the Sands, although they are likely to stay there for many years, maybe millennia.</p>
<p>The greatest single event causing loss of life occurred with the Great Storm of 1703. Many warships had taken refuge in the Downs, and Ramsgate harbour to ride out the storm, but after an initial lull the storm returned with a vengeance. Daniel Defoe’s account of the storm (“The Storm” - republished in 2003 to mark the 300 year anniversary of the event) is the principle document covering this event, and it tells the story of 13 Man &#8216;o War lost, amongst many others, and over 2000 sailors. Included in the toll were:</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Northumberland</strong>, 3rd rate Man o’ War, with 70 guns and 253 men. No survivors.</li>
<li><strong>Mary</strong>, 4th rate, 272 men and the Admiral lost. One survivor.</li>
<li><strong>Stirling</strong><strong> Castle</strong>, 3rd rate Man o’ War, with 70 guns and 349 men. 70 survivors.</li>
<li><strong>Restoration</strong>, 70 guns, all 386 crew lost.</li>
</ul>
<p>The sole survivor from the Mary, Thomas Atkins, had an almost unbelievable escape. He was thrown from the deck of the Mary as it floundered, a large wave then throwing him onto the deck of the Stirling Castle. As the Stirling Castle became wrecked, he was again thrown into waves but again had a huge slice of luck as he was washed into the only boat to be broken adrift from the Stirling Castle. He eventually beached on the Kent coast and survived despite suffering from exposure.</p>
<p>The Stirling Castle has actually been located in recent years, and had been well protected by its sandy grave, but sadly is deteriorating now. See the <a href="http://splash.wessexarch.co.uk/2007/10/17/stirling-castle-goodwin-sands/">Wessex Archaeology Coastal and Marine blog</a> for photos of the wreck.</p>
<p>Other notable wrecks include the SS Violet, which was the first steamship to be claimed by the Sands in 1857. In more recent times, the story of the German U-boat U48 is notable as it is one of several wrecks that have re-emerged from the sands for short periods of time before being re-swallowed. The U48 was caught on the surface charging its batteries during World War I. It was shelled by several ships, and chased into the Goodwin Sands, where its crew were forced to surrender. It was then of course swallowed by the sands, where it lay hidden except for a brief reappearance in 1921, and then unexpectedly again in 1973.</p>
<p>Two wrecks, both in 1946, were in fact sister ships; The Luray Victory (9000 tons) ran aground in January, and then the North Eastern Victory broke in two on the sands the following winter. They were notable because they did not become fully swallowed like so many other ships; possibly they were positioned on the chalk base. In any case the masts of the ships were still visible as late as the 1990’s.</p>
<h3>The Boatsmen</h3>
<p>A history of the Goodwin Sands would not be complete without telling the story of the Boatsmen of Walmer, Deal and Kingsdown. These men were the centre of an industry along this stretch of coast, saving lives, but perhaps more importantly to them; earning a living from the salvage of wrecked shipping. The ‘industry’ had up to 1000 men involved at any one time over the centuries, and at the first sign of a wreck dozens of boats would race to be the first to board a wreck and hopefully claim salvage rights. There were four rival groups; Kingsdown, Walmer Road, Deal South End, and Deal North End. The rivalry between the two Deal groups in particular could be described as bitter.</p>
<h3>Saving lives - The lightships and lifeboats</h3>
<p>Before the 19th century, there had been talk of setting about beacons, and creating official lifeboats, but it wasn’t until 1852 that the first lifeboat was launched, the Northumberland operating from Ramsgate. In 1857, a further boat the “Royal Thames Yacht Club” was based in Walmer, and by 1865 there were four lifeboats.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.english-coast.net/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/deal-boatsmen.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-13" title="Lifeboatmen" src="http://www.english-coast.net/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/deal-boatsmen.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="346" /></a></p>
<p><span style="color: #c0c0c0;"><em>Image: The Boom of a Distant Gun, reproduced under Project Gutenberg License from an original photograph by W.H.Franklin<br />
</em></span></p>
<p>The first lightship was positioned at North Sand Head in 1795, and another at the Gull Stream in 1809. The final two lightships were added at South Sand Head in 1832, and at East Goodwin in 1874. The lightships were positioned to warn shipping of the danger, but also to alert the lifeboats when a ship became stranded. The lightships are not themselves without tragedy, for example in 1954 the South Sand lightship was wrecked and all seven crew lost, the only survivor being a researcher. There is currently only one lightship in operation, at East Goodwin, the others being replaced by automated beacons.</p>
<h3>Events on the Goodwin Sands</h3>
<p><a href="http://www.english-coast.net/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/hovercraft-goodwin-sands.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-14" title="Hovercraft on goodwin Sands" src="http://www.english-coast.net/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/hovercraft-goodwin-sands-150x109.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="109" /></a>At low tide, the sands are firm enough to stand on and so a number of events have taken place on the Sands over the years. In recent times, probably the most famous events are the cricket matches played on the sands. The <a href="http://www.goodwinsands.org.uk/">Goodwin Sands Potholing Club</a> were able to make a number of visits when the cross-channel hovercraft were operating from Dover, this providing the ideal charter craft!</p>
<p><span style="color: #999999;"><span style="text-decoration: underline;">References</span><br />
Shipwrecks of the Goodwin Sands<em>, Richard &amp; Bridget Larn (Meresborough)<br />
</em>Shipwrecks of Great Britain and Ireland<em>, Richard Larn<br />
</em></span><span style="color: #999999;">Heroes of the Goodwin Sands,<em> Rev. Thomas Stanley Treanor, M.A. (The Religious Tract Society 1904)</em></span><a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/kent/3239670.stm"><br />
Storm victims remembered</a>, <span style="color: #999999;"><em>BBC News website</em>, as retrieved 23th May 2008</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.english-coast.net/blog/2008/05/goodwin-sands-history/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Coastal erosion, White cliffs of Dover</title>
		<link>http://www.english-coast.net/blog/2008/04/coastal-erosion-white-cliffs-of-dover/</link>
		<comments>http://www.english-coast.net/blog/2008/04/coastal-erosion-white-cliffs-of-dover/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 20:57:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Kent]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Cliff falls]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Coastal erosion]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Dover]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.english-coast.net/blog/?p=5</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nice illustration of coastal erosion, photo taken of the white cliffs of Dover, St.Margaret&#8217;s Bay. The cliff fall occurred early 2008. The paths above the cliffs do warn you to stay 10 metres from the edge, and when you see evidence of the cliff falls it makes you take notice of the warnings!

 
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice illustration of coastal erosion, photo taken of the white cliffs of Dover, St.Margaret&#8217;s Bay. The cliff fall occurred early 2008. The paths above the cliffs do warn you to stay 10 metres from the edge, and when you see evidence of the cliff falls it makes you take notice of the warnings!</p>
<p><img src="http://www.english-coast.net/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/04/dsc_1661.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="533" /></p>
<p> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.english-coast.net/blog/2008/04/coastal-erosion-white-cliffs-of-dover/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>HDR - friend or foe</title>
		<link>http://www.english-coast.net/blog/2008/04/hdr-friend-or-foe/</link>
		<comments>http://www.english-coast.net/blog/2008/04/hdr-friend-or-foe/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 18:47:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[HDR]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Photography]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Dover]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[HDR photography]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.english-coast.net/blog/?p=1</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve been fascinated by some of the HDR (High Dynamic Range) images that you find on the web, and was keen to try it out myself. The main concern I had was whether the use of HDR is part of the art of photography, or whether it makes it &#8216;too easy&#8217; to create great images. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been fascinated by some of the HDR (High Dynamic Range) images that you find on the web, and was keen to try it out myself. The main concern I had was whether the use of HDR is part of the art of photography, or whether it makes it &#8216;too easy&#8217; to create great images. If it does make it &#8216;too easy&#8217; then does that actually matter?</p>
<p>Anyway to test it out I took a single fairly ordinary RAW image (Nikon NEF) that I had taken at the weekend, and tried to create an HDR image to see what difference this would make.</p>
<p>The image is of a sea wall at St.Margarets at Cliffe, near Dover, Kent, England. I took the photo on my way back from shooting a <a title="Coastal panorama, Dover" href="http://www.english-coast.net/kent/dover/white-cliffs-dover00014_photo.html">panorama</a>, simply because there were three white rocks in a line, no real attempts at composition or anything (it had started raining and I wanted to get back to the car!). Here is the original JPG copy of the image straight from the camera (resized in Photoshop):</p>
<p> <img src="http://www.english-coast.net/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/04/dsc_1664.jpg" alt="" width="402" height="600" /></p>
<p> Using Dynamic-Photo HDR software, I imported the NEF version of the file, selected the &#8216;eye-catching&#8217; mode, adjusted the tone mapping and here is the result:</p>
<p><img src="http://www.english-coast.net/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/04/dsc_1664_hdr.jpg" alt="" width="402" height="600" /> </p>
<p>5 minutes work has certainly made for a more dramatic image. Certainly oversaturated, the white stones have turned gray, I clearly need to do some finetuning, but it does give an indication of what is possible.</p>
<p>An improvement? I&#8217;ll leave that for others to decide!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.english-coast.net/blog/2008/04/hdr-friend-or-foe/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
